- Why should there be any economic consequences even for Iran (which, as one of the most petroleum-rich countries on Earth, has no real need of peaceful atomic energy), still less for anyone else? Perhaps you think that a strike upon Iran would lead to an end of that state's petroleum exports; that, however, did not happen in the case of Iraq, whose reactor Israel wiped out three decades ago.
- If your thesis were valid, what financial ramifications could outweigh the disaster of Ahmadinejad-and-company's acquiring nuclear arms?
- Has
it occurred to you that, in attempting to dissuade Israel from using force, you
are accidentally revealing to the Iranians that Obombast and his minions lie
when they say that "all options are on the table?"
- Why
are you, instead of the US ambassador to Israel, even communicating this
message?
- Don't you realize that the policies of your own political party have been adversely affecting our economy and that of the world for over four years now?
19 November 2011
Uncommon Commentary #228: Secretary of the Dense
As if it weren't bad enough to expect somebody else to carry out the task of crippling Iran's nuclear program, Secretary
of Defense Panetta is now warning Israel against employing her military to do the rest of the world this favor, saying that to do so could or would have "economic consequences … that could impact not just on our economy but the
world economy." This bizarre
justification for inaction raises questions that I would like to ask
Mr. Panetta:
17 November 2011
Uncommon Commentary #227: Maybe It's His Brain That's in Asia
In
the year of his election to the presidency, Obama, whom his worshipers and even
some sane persons have credited with extraordinarily high intelligence, said
that there are 57 US States; during this week's recent press conference in his
native Hawaii, he made a reference to being "here in Asia." (Hawaii,
which actually lies closer to North America than to Asia, is not considered
part of any continent.) Perhaps the
deficiencies in his geographical knowledge explain why he behaves so
autocratically: all this time, he may have been under the impression that he's
the ruler of the authoritarian People's Republic of China.
16 November 2011
Uncommon Commentary #226: Penitential State
Here are some more thoughts on the scandal at the Pennsylvania State
University:
- If Sandusky is guilty of the charges against him, he needs help just as truly as he does punishment. (Those things are not mutually exclusive.) Incarceration alone may teach him that it was wrong to engage in pederasty, but will do nothing to cure him of the psychological affliction that motivated his behavior.
- The mere fact that Paterno was head football coach while misconduct allegedly took place in the football complex doesn't mean that he somehow shares in the responsibility for it. It seems that nowadays here in the litigation nation, even being esteemed one of the most highly moral public figures over a span of four-and-a-half decades doesn't earn one immunity from judgmentalism; this I find just as disgusting as the reputed offenses of Sandusky.
11 November 2011
Uncommon Commentary #225: Bored of Trustees
Specifically, I'm
bored of the trustees of the Pennsylvania
State University (which is the correct name, you know, as opposed to "Penn State"). Of course, I'm
actually more than bored; I'm indignant at that body for dismissing head
football coach Joe Paterno. Mike McQueary, a member of Paterno's staff, says
that in 2002 former defensive
co-ordinator Jerry Sandusky and a 10-year old boy were on campus in connection
with Sandusky's charity, and that he witnessed Sandusky sodomize the boy in the
shower at the football complex. He reported
the alleged incident—Let's not forget (although I'm certain that this fact
didn't even occur to most of us, in this age of guilty-until-proven-innocent
mentality) that this is, so far, only allegation—to Paterno, who relayed notice
thereof to athletic director Tim Curley
and vice president Gary Schultz, who told the university president (who also
has been sacked). The university barred
Sandusky from campus, but apparently failed to alert the police, as State law
required; Curley and Schultz have now been charged with that crime, as well as
perjury. Sandusky is accused of
molesting eight boys over a 15-year span; Paterno is not suspected of any
wrongdoing. Curley, Schultz, and Paterno have all testified that what they
heard about Sandusky's behavior in the purported incident paled in comparison
with what McQueary related to a grand jury.
On
Wednesday, Paterno said "I have come to work every day for the last 61
years with one clear goal in mind: to serve the best interests of this
university and the young men who have been entrusted to my care. I have the
same goal today. That's why I have decided to announce my retirement effective
at the end of this season." (He also said "I grieve for the children
and their families, and I pray for their comfort and relief" and
"with the benefit of hindsight, I wish I had done more," and that he
is "absolutely devastated by the developments in this case," which he
called "one of the great sorrows of my life.") Why wasn't this
acceptable to the trustees, who, later that day, made the termination of his illustrious career effective immediately?
Paterno reacted with far more grace than was demonstrated by those who had
sacrificed him, saying: "I am disappointed with the Board of Trustees'
decision, but I have to accept it. A tragedy occurred, and we all have to have
patience to let the legal process proceed. I appreciate the outpouring of
support but want to emphasize that everyone should remain calm and please
respect the university, its property, and all that we value. I have been
incredibly blessed to spend my entire career working with people I love. I am
grateful beyond words to all of the coaches, players, and staff who have been a
part of this program. And to all of our fans and supporters, my family and I
will be forever in your debt."
And so, the same
institution that elected to retain corrupt scientist Michael Mann, even when
the Weathergate scandal was yet fresh, has discharged the most famously
scrupulous personage in US collegiate sports, even though his departure was
less than two months off. There's nothing trusty about those trustees.
02 November 2011
Uncommon Commentary #224: Perhaps He Meant to Say "Unprecedented Level of Brokenness …"
Current
policy is that if our government (theoretically only when acting in the
interests of security and when it considers a document exempt from the Freedom
of Information Act) does not wish to produce something to which someone has
requested access under the FOIA, then it may respond that it will neither
confirm nor deny that the said thing is extant; Emperor Nerobama's Injustice
Department proposes that an agency that withholds materials "will respond
to the request as if the excluded records did not exist." The proposal has come under deserved criticism
for violating Obombast's promise of "an unprecedented level of openness in
government," but what's worse than that betrayal is the administration's
likely motive, which is to shield its officials from prosecution for purposefully
misleading seekers of the truth. I wish
I could deny that the Obama presidency
exists.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)