In the late
1980’s and the 1990’s, when global-warming hysteria was young, my position on
the subject was that it was entirely appropriate to carry out research on whether catastrophic, anthropogenic
“climate change” (to use the term that adherents of the global-warmist religion
now prefer) is taking place, but that there was no cause for panic. By now, however, those who want to find real
evidence of such an apocalypse have had over a quarter of a century in which to
do so—And the burden of proof is on them,
not on the skeptics, because it’s the former who demand that we cope with this
putative threat through radical action, which would both eliminate millions of
jobs in the fossil-fuel industries and raise energy costs for consumers (and because
long-term variation in world temperatures is natural, as anyone who has ever
heard of the Ice Ages of the Pleistocene Epoch ought to know)—and they haven’t
found it, although they talk as if
they had. It’s ironic that Al Gory,
President Obombast, &c. habitually apply the word "deniers" to
anyone who does not follow them obsequiously in this regard, since it's
actually they who have taken on the rôle of obscurantist as they wilfully
ignore the "pause" in warming (1998-present, which means that its
inception actually predates Gory’s launching of his anti-“global-warming”
crusade) and other evidence that discredits the alarmist position. As you like to say, Al, “the debate is over”,
and you’ve lost!