It's remarkable how seriously some otherwise-sensible commentators apparently
take the notion of an "Obama Doctrine". If Obama's approach to the upheavals in the
Near East were consistent enough to be called a "doctrine", would he
have reacted as inconsistently as he
has? After weeks of defying pressure to do
something to aid the rebellion in Libya, he abruptly reversed his public stance
and ended up taking the USA to war without a declaration of such; he denied
that his administration was working toward Gaddafi's violent overthrow, and
then claimed credit for the violent overthrow when it did occur; he spent two years resisting calls for
intervention in Syria—this resistance included drawing a "red line"
over the use of chemical weapons, the crossing of which he never made a
precondition for joining the fight versus Gaddafi—before executing another
Libya-style flip-flop, which so far has not led to anything but a promise to
supply anti-Assad insurgents with small arms; and he has dithered over policy
regarding Egypt in the wake of the Muslim Brotherhood's ouster, first calling
for a "review" on whether to continue military aid, then justifying
continuation of that aid by describing the (latest) coup d'état as a popular
revolution, and presently holding up that aid, specifically, the delivery to
Egypt of four F-16's that we promised to that country while Morsi and his ilk
were still in power.
It seems obvious to
me that, when President Obombast speaks of the election of radical Islamists as
a "transitional phase" between secular despotism and secular
"democracy", he's not elucidating a doctrine but merely pretending
that the developments of the disastrous "Arab Spring" are proceeding
just as he had planned. Foreign-policy doctrines
are only for presidents who sincerely try to serve in their country's best interests.
31 July 2013
30 July 2013
Miscellaneous Musing #55
The decrease in the annual reported number of induced abortions in this
country, from approximately 1.6 million two decades ago to an estimated 1.2
million nowadays, is welcome news except for a caveat; note the word
"reported". For its data on
abortions, the government relies on the very industry that performs them, which
has obvious incentive to conceal the committing of the late-term foeticides
that have been made illegal in the majority of States. It seems unlikely that this alone could
account for a 25 percent drop, but, of course, there may be other factors, such
as the concurrent loss of stigma toward unwed motherhood. Anyway, this is not an uncommon commentary
but only a miscellaneous musing, and so my object here is not to state anything
positively but merely to wonder what the truth is in this case.
26 July 2013
Blatant Self-Promotion #1
My "epic novella" and
"Christian historical fantasy-adventure" Vinland Viking: An Original Saga by
Gary L. Doman is going on a
"virtual book tour" next month; take careful note of the dates for
the v.b.t., as this will be the most important occurrence in the history of
mankind!
Monday,
August 5th
Book review at The Book Connection
Tuesday, August 6th
Guest post at Literarily Speaking
Wednesday, August 7th
Interview at Blogcritics
Thursday, August 8th
Guest post at Lori’s Reading Corner
Friday, August 9th
Guest post and giveaway at The Busy Mom’s Daily
Monday, August 12th
Interview at Between the Covers
Tuesday, August 13th
Guest post for Cheryl’s Christian
Book Connection
Wednesday, August 14th
Guest post at The Story Behind the Book
Thursday, August 15th
Book review at A Year of Jubilee Reviews
Friday, August 16th
Book spotlight at The Writer’s Life
Book spotlight at 4 the Love of Books
Monday, August 19th
Interview at As the Pages Turn
Tuesday, August 20th
Book review at Vic’s Media Room
Wednesday, August 21st
Interview at Examiner
Thursday, August 22nd
Book spotlight at My Devotional Thoughts
Friday, August 23rd
Book review at Found A Christian by His
Grace
Monday, August 26th
Book spotlight at Review from Here
Wednesday, August 28th
Interview at Broowaha
Friday, August 30th
Interview at Pump Up Your Book
Book review at Blooming with Books23 July 2013
UC #352: Listen to Him Rave On About Trayvon!
President YoMama's (see the list of domanisms, below) statement that
Trayvon [sic] Martin "could have been me [sic] 35 years ago" speaks
no better of the punk-turned-"martyr" than what the police discovered
on the deceased's telephone!
16 July 2013
Uncommon Commentary #351: If They Really Think that They're All Just One Person, They Have Bigger Problems than I Thought
Pro-injustice
demonstrators are bearing signs that read "We Are All Trayvon Martin".
If that message is true, God help them! As was inevitable on the part of
people who jump to race-based conclusions (or who simply don't care what the
truth is, so long as they can satisfy their desire to hate), those who demanded
that George Zimmerman (a Caucasoid who reportedly is Hispanic, and so doesn't
qualify as "White" in our odd ethnic terminology) be tried and
convicted for the killing of the Black Trayvon [sic] Martin have depicted the
latter as a saint; photographs and text messages discovered on his cellular
telephone—not "cell phone", please—give us rather a different
portrayal. The subjects of Martin's photographs, for instance, include
marijuana plants, a hand "menacingly" holding a semi-automatic
pistol, and even naked underage girls. In contrast, Zimmerman (who, by
the way, is part Black) and his wife mentored two (Black) children for no
charge, and Reuters interviewers found that the accused's neighbors,
no matter what their ethnicity, regarded him as caring deeply for them.
Also, I have a message for President Obombast: Martin's death obviously is a tragedy for him, but it is not "a tragedy for America [sic]". (By the last of these words I assume that you mean the United States of America, not the entire New World, i.e., North and South America.) The real tragedy for this country is that the response to what examination of the facts revealed to be a justifiable homicide, and to acquittal as the result of a trial that ought not to have even taken place—after all, the Sanford police chief declined to charge Zimmerman with any crime, and the local district attorney chose not to prosecute—demonstrates that, years after your election to the US presidency, We the People are still obsessed with race.
Also, I have a message for President Obombast: Martin's death obviously is a tragedy for him, but it is not "a tragedy for America [sic]". (By the last of these words I assume that you mean the United States of America, not the entire New World, i.e., North and South America.) The real tragedy for this country is that the response to what examination of the facts revealed to be a justifiable homicide, and to acquittal as the result of a trial that ought not to have even taken place—after all, the Sanford police chief declined to charge Zimmerman with any crime, and the local district attorney chose not to prosecute—demonstrates that, years after your election to the US presidency, We the People are still obsessed with race.
11 July 2013
The Best of Uncommon Commentary
In view of this month’s developments in Egypt, and
especially of the army’s explanation that (what obviously was, but which they
deny was) its coup d'état came in response to the popular upheaval against
Morsi's misrule, you may want to revisit UC #150.
04 July 2013
Uncommon Commentary #350!: The List in Paragraph Two Also Includes Obama
According to a news item, President Obombast has "urged
a quick return to elected civilian government" in Egypt, and said that
"we are deeply concerned by the decision of the Egyptian Armed Forces to
remove President Morsi and suspend the Egyptian constitution." Shockingly, the same story relates that he
"said [that he] had ordered a review of the legal implications for US aid
to Egypt in the wake of the military's toppling of the elected leader". Obama, then, renewed the USA's annual $1.3
billion in military aid to Egypt in May, when there was no indication that our
enemy Morsi would fall from power, yet he considers there to be "legal
implications" now as a result of
the coup d'état? Is he really so obtuse
as not to perceive that this counterrevolutionary act is the best that we (and
everyone else except the Islamists) could hope for in Egypt?
Mohammed Morsi was indeed "democratically elected", but so were the National Socialists ("Nazis"), the Hamas, Hugo Chávez, Yassir Arafat, Salvador Allende, Vladimir Putin, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and so forth; what has that to do with right and wrong? I may be risking stoning by patriots in making this statement on 4 July, but I here assert that sovereignty resides not in the People but in our divine sovereign. The Bible tells us, as in Romans 13:1, that rulers derive their authority from God; it has no qualification as to whether those leaders have attained power "democratically", and, indeed, none of them had, for Judæa was a province of the Roman Empire when St. Paul wrote that verse. What we miscall "democracy" is no more inviolable than any other mere human institution.
I bid "Good riddance" to Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood theocrats, but there are plenty of equally dangerous radicals who could well gain power if the Egyptian military heeds our president's urging; fortunately, no one outside the USA still seems to pay much attention to anything that Obama says.
Mohammed Morsi was indeed "democratically elected", but so were the National Socialists ("Nazis"), the Hamas, Hugo Chávez, Yassir Arafat, Salvador Allende, Vladimir Putin, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and so forth; what has that to do with right and wrong? I may be risking stoning by patriots in making this statement on 4 July, but I here assert that sovereignty resides not in the People but in our divine sovereign. The Bible tells us, as in Romans 13:1, that rulers derive their authority from God; it has no qualification as to whether those leaders have attained power "democratically", and, indeed, none of them had, for Judæa was a province of the Roman Empire when St. Paul wrote that verse. What we miscall "democracy" is no more inviolable than any other mere human institution.
I bid "Good riddance" to Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood theocrats, but there are plenty of equally dangerous radicals who could well gain power if the Egyptian military heeds our president's urging; fortunately, no one outside the USA still seems to pay much attention to anything that Obama says.
03 July 2013
Miscellaneous Musing #54 Update
In
Miscellaneous Musing #54, I wrote that Snowden "seeks asylum in polities
which (save Iceland) are unfriendly to the USA"; since then, however,
WikiLeaks [sic] has released the names of 19 more states to which he has made
requests either for asylum or for assistance in seeking asylum. The total
list now comprises Austria, Bolivia, Brazil, the People's Republic of China,
Cuba, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, India, the Republic of
Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, Norway, Poland, Russia, Spain,
Switzerland, and Venezuela; just one third of these, i.e., Bolivia, mainland
China, Cuba, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Russia, and Venezuela, can really be
considered US antagonists.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)