A
television series called Ripley’s Believe it or Not!, hosted by Jack and
Holly Palance, aired in the 1980’s. According
to one episode, the French government’s own records prove that Joan of Arc was
still alive years after her supposed burning at the stake, and that she was of
royal rather than humble lineage. I
don’t know whether this information is correct, but, if so, I’m not surprised,
for I had always found the tale of this putative saint (whose canonization did
not take place until 1925, half a millennium after her lifetime) to be rather
an odd one. Why should God care who won
a war between the forces of the King of England and those of the King of
France?
In feudal Scotland, it was the
prerogative of the clan chief, even if the chief were female, to lead the
clansmen in battle. Rarely, as you might
expect, did a woman actually do so; what she would typically do is lead them to battle, delegate the command thereof
to a male subordinate, and then station herself outside the battlefield but
close enough to it so that she would still be visible to her troops. Nevertheless, since high birth was considered
to be more important than one’s sex, she could command them personally if she
so desired. This principle may be the
key to understanding how the legend of Joan of Arc developed; French
propagandists presumably took what was already a phenomenal occurrence, military
exploits by a member of the gentler sex, and embellished it with fictions about
her being an ignorant peasant girl given a divine mission to liberate her
country, in order to make it seem that God was on their side. God is on the side of the victims of armed conflict, not necessarily
that of the victors.