The
subject of Vital Link #4 brings to my mind two questions:
1) Since Anwar
al-Awlaki was a US (as well as Yemeni) national, why didn't we attempt a raid,
like that which had taken out foreigner Usama bin Laden, to seize him if
possible? Is it for the same reason why
we now make little if any effort to capture non-citizen terrorists, namely,
that President Yo'Mama (see the list of domanisms) doesn't want his administration to have to decide
whether to hold civilian trials or military tribunals? (According to Leon
Panetta, Navy SEAL Team Six members were expected to try to take bin Laden
alive if they did not further endanger their own lives in doing so; it has,
however, become hard to avoid suspecting that al-Qaeda's chief was spared death-by-drone
only because the walls of his compound shielded him from such an attack.)
2) Isn't our chief executor—I
mean, executive's—current disregard
of Pakistani sovereignty an instance of "unilateralism", which he
condemned when allegedly practiced by his predecessor?